Hitlers Foreign Policy and the Treaty of Versailles

Hitler s Foreign Policy and the Treaty of Versailles Treaty of Versailles, signed with Germany in 1919 had one main purpose – to protect the planet from another world war. Germany, the country guilty for the World War One had to accept a number of unfavorable conditions: 1. Enormous reparations (6,6 billion pounds) were implied 2. The army was limited to 100 000 soldiers 3. Tanks, fleet and aircraft were banned However, the main ideas concerned the foreign policy: 1. Poznan was to e come a Polish province 2. Danzig was announced a free city 3. Alsace and Lorraine were to be returned to France 4. Germany lost all of its colonies 5. The union of Austria and Germany was forbidden Today historians†¦show more content†¦This has been done because the British realized the Germans would do so anyway, and the positive attitude of Great Britain should promote peace between the two countries. The Germans, however, saw it as a sign weakness. After 1935 the Treaty of Versailles ba sically had little sense, as most of its parts have been violated. Some points, that still seemed to have some strength have been intentionally destroyed a bit later. In 1936 Germany reoccupied the demilitarized Rheinland zone, under feeble protests from the side of France. Two years later, in 1938 the Germany announced an â€Å"Anschluss† with Austria and basically devoured the smaller state, creating a controlled Nazi government. Same year, following the Munich agreement, Hitler gained the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia. In 1939 the final, most severe violation of the basic principles of international law and virtually all of the existent treaties, lead to the beginning of World War II. When â€Å"Vermacht† invaded Poland, Great Britain and France declared war on Germany. It is clearly seen that all parts of the Hitler’s international politics in 1930-s are aimed to begin a war. Unfortunately, the Appeasement strategy of the democratic western states allowed th e terrible regime to rise and gain strength, causing the most devastating catastrophe in the human history. . Works cited: 1) â€Å"Causes of World War II† accessed July 25,Show MoreRelatedAssess How Hitlers Ideology Affected Nazi Foreign Policy Between 1933-391528 Words   |  7 Pagesas the catalyst for Hitler’s foreign policy. A.J.P. Taylor even goes on to argue that Hitler was not only continuing a policy of previous German governments but he also believes Hitler can not be directly implemented in the events which unleashed WW2. However, to attribute Hitler’s foreign policy purely to his opportunistic characteristics would be to ignore his personal motivations and both racist and expansionist ideology. This facile explanation also fails to look at Hitler’s intentions echoed fearlesslyRead MoreHilters Foreign Policy Essay1226 Words   |  5 PagesHilters Foreign Policy A dynamic foreign policy played a fundamental role in Hitlers rule, his decisions often revolving around his foreign policy aims. Hitlers aims were ambitions, the globalist school of thought most notably Rausching believe his ultimate aim was simply the maximum of power and domination; namely ultimate power. Hitler in the future planning to gain Germen supremacy in the Middle East, Africa and finally in the USA after conquering Europe. Such notions however; as NoakesRead MoreHitler s Dream Of Making Germany A Global Power And The Futile Policy Of The World War II974 Words   |  4 PagesWorld War II, but instead a result of several different factors. The Treaty of Versailles was excessively harsh and angered the Germany people, The Great Depression resulted in European Nations not have the resources to prepare an army, Hitler’s dream of making Germany a global power and the futile Policy of Appeasement were all factors that caused World War II. Although multiple factors contributed to the start of WW2, Hitler’s agenda was the most prominent factor in starting WW2. Hitler always wantedRead MoreHitler Essay1204 Words   |  5 Pagesregards to Hitler’s foreign policy. In September 1938, during the Czechoslovakian crisis, the appeasers appeased to Hitler’s taking of the Sudetenland due to the threat of war. On October first 1938 in the Daily Herald Newspaper, the headline stated that Mr. Chamberlain declared that â€Å"It is peace for our time†. Some people say that the appeasers, such as Neville Chamberlain, were the indirect cause of World War two. b) The main point that Mein Kampf reveals about Hitler’s foreign policy in the 1920’sRead MoreGermany and the Treaty of Versailles1363 Words   |  6 PagesGermany the Treaty of Versailles The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919 at the great Palace of Versailles in France. The victorious Allies, (Great Britain, France and Italy, and the United States), all came together to decide what punishment Germany should receive for the total devastation left by this war that they started, and what to do with the Central Powers, (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire) in general. The Allies were furious that they had lost so muchRead MoreExplaining the Cause of World War Two Essay1078 Words   |  5 Pages and show how they all link together or overlap. All these causes reinforce each other and can be split into short, medium or long term causes. These key causes are; the failure of the league, consequences of the treaty of Versailles, Hitlers foreign policy, the great depression, appeasement, Nazi Soviet pact and the invasion of Poland. The failure of the league in the 1930s led to a number of consequences and could be described as a long term cause. The leagues Read MoreGermany s Foreign Policy During World War II1981 Words   |  8 Pagesaggressive foreign policy largely contributed to the outbreak of World War II. Revisionist and orthodox views regarding Hitler’s foreign policies can both be argued. The orthodox view suggests Hitler’s actions were the main contributors to the outbreak of war, whereas the revisionist view counterclaims the policy of appeasement, and foreign policies of Japan and Italy were primary contributors. Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945, assumed responsibility for German foreign policy in JanuaryRead MoreWorld War Two Was the Result of the Aggression and Ambition of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party991 Words   |  4 Pagesof government, Nazism. They were for a leadership approach, glorifying violence and war. With the Italian Fascists with the Germans, they provided the impulse which drove Europe into war. However they would have to get passed the treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations. Hitler would have to sign a deal under Chamberlain, where Hitler could only take back the rein land that was thought to be rightfully theres. In no circumstances was Hitler able to build up an aggressiveRead MoreWhy Did A.J.P Taylor’s Analysis of the Origins of the Second World War Cause Such Controversy Among Historians?759 Words   |  4 PagesWhy did A.J.P Taylor’s analysis of the origins of the Second World War cause such controversy among historians? It was broadly considered that the Second World War began in 1939 because of Hitler’s plan for world domination; many historians validated this view at the time until A.J.P. Taylor published his book ‘Origins of the Second World War’ in 1961. A. J. P Taylor was the first historian to examine the war with a completely open mind, forcing people to view the origins not as a moral issue butRead MoreStructuralist and Intentionalist approaches to Nazi Germany2254 Words   |  10 Pagesdivided into categories in regard to dealing with Nazi Germany foreign policy and its relation to Hitler: intentionalist, and structuralist. The intentionalist interpretation focuses on Hitlers own steerage of Nazi foreign policy in accordance with a clear, concise programme planned long in advance. The structuralist approach puts forth the idea that Hitler seized opportunities as they came, radicalizing the foreign policies of the Nazi regime in response. Structuralists reject the i dea